Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different options available for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
A lot of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, which makes it hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are because of smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, since many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that folks who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The writer suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The Juul Compatible Pods problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t understand how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from that is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers may be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they are taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the chance of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that we have already seen the unwanted effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports about the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have plenty of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a key point in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last few years.
The author does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to think about the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who try to quit often do so due to other medical issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are lots of reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it holds true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals found in using tobacco are found in the smokes. The author seems to be of the belief that all we have to do to solve the problem of smoking is to reduce the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not located in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing how much chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.